Transformation
Through Action Methods
-Most commonly asked questions:
What are Action Methods?
Action Methods refer to forms of therapy derived from psychodrama,
experiential and expressive arts therapies, engaging the
right side of the brain as well as the left side. Powerful outcomes can result
from single well-executed session. Psychodrama is a form of psychotherapy
developed by Dr. J.L. and Zerka Moreno that uses acting to facilitate
problem solving. The client, called the protagonist, puts his/her
truth into action with the assistance of the therapist, called the
director, and other participants, called auxiliaries.
Does this happen in a theatre?
Originally, it did. Today, it may happen in any safe, private space
mutually agreed upon by the director and protagonist.
How can this help beyond talking about things?
Recent neurobiological research shows that modalities like
psychodrama which engage both sides of the brain are most
effective. To paraphrase
Dr. Bessel van der Kolk, people need to move beyond talk into action:
- Integration of Mindbodyheartspirit
- Gain insight,
express feelings in a safe environment
- Heal emotional wounds
from trauma, loss, eating disorders, addictions
- Resolve
interpersonal conflicts
- Discover and build strengths and
skills
- Release potential for creativity
- Transform
old patterns of living into positive choices
- Expand the
possibilities of a purposeful life
- Let go of old roles that
are no longer useful, and develop new, healthier
ones
- Practice more effective ways
of communicating
- Experience
the life–changing power of this safe, expressive, experiential
modality of healing heartwounds
What is a Private Psychodrama?
“ Whether or not one is familiar with psychodrama, a private experience
of this form of inner work offers a powerful personal
growth modality. With
the help of the director, the individual (who is called the “protagonist”)
establishes a contract for the work to be addressed during the psychodrama
(usually 3-4 hours). One or more experienced assistants (called “auxiliaries”)
will most likely be available to take necessary roles not being played
by the protagonist. The protagonist needs to have in mind and heart
awareness of the subject to be explored. The director
of the psychodrama will take care of everything else.
With Linda as my director, I have worked on a series
of private psychodramas over the past year. It is not possible to overestimate the growth
I have experienced as the inevitable outcome of each undertaking. For
me, the ongoing effects of each deep intrapsychic episode tend to manifest
over time. Since I started my private psychodramas, I am different as I
live my life from day to day. I realize that my psychodramatic work
has synergized with and potentiated all that I do to take care of myself
in the here-and-now, and all that I do to progress
toward self-realization.
In particular psychodramas, I have faced betrayals,
self-doubts, relationships with family members, and
my creativity. Because I have
worked through an ongoing series of private psychodramas, each one has
built upon those before. Although an “ah-ha!” moment
- - or many - - is not unusual during the drama itself, I have come to
treasure the long-term effects of the psychodramatic work that I slowly
discern over weeks and months. I have changed patterns of behavior
entrenched for years. Always my work has been intense,
sometimes it has made me laugh, sometimes cry, but always
psychodrama has helped
me to experience who I am on deeper and deeper levels.
As I cannot overestimate the growth I have experienced
as a result of my psychodramatic work, likewise I
cannot overestimate the expert
leadership of Linda through all that I have encountered. First and foremost
Linda has unfailingly maintained a completely safe psychodramatic space
in which the work takes place. And she has shaped each drama masterfully: Linda
assists me as I begin the work, she facilitates my entry into the deep
work, she helps me to emerge from the deep work, and she makes sure I am
ready to re-enter daily life. Linda does all of this
so seamlessly that I am often surprised at the smoothness
of the transition from
part to part of each drama.
My private psychodramas with Linda as my director
have become a major way that I help myself to become the
best person that I can be. I
hope to continue to explore what needs discernment
through more private psychodramas with Linda.”
~ E. S., Maryland, Private Psychodrama Client
What about my counselor / psychotherapist?
The director works closely with your individual therapist
before and after a private drama, group experience
or workshop, and
he/she may attend and/or participate in the private drama. (You
will need to sign a form to authorize this.)
What if I need more than one session?
Respectful pacing is fundamental to this work. A series of private
sessions may be scheduled if needed; or you may participate in on-going
groups or workshops.
What about fees?
Payment for a private psychodrama is made prior to
the day of the
drama by cash or check. Insurance and credit cards not accepted. The protagonist
pays the director, auxiliaries, and space rental costs. Director’s
fee is $200/hour plus travel expenses (if any). Fees for groups and
workshops vary.
Back to Top
-Is this something for me?
- Am I having on-going difficulties in relationships?
- Am
I troubled by intrusive memories and/or flashbacks?
- Am I
stuck in the process of grieving and unable to move on
with life?
- Do I feel weighed down by feelings
of low self esteem, depression
or helplessness?
- Do I have trouble
identifying and accessing my
strengths?
- Do I want to find creative
solutions to problems?
- Do
I want to learn how to be true to myself?
- Do I feel disconnected
from my body?
- Do I feel used? Am I tired of having
people walk all over me?
- Do I want to let go of
old behaviors that
keep sabotaging my well-being?
- Do I want to understand
why I make the
same mistakes repeatedly and
stop doing that?
Interview for the US Bodypsychotherapy Assn
.
CREATIVE CONVERSATIONS IN SOMATIC PSYCHOTHERAPY
June 2007: Linda Ciotola
Linda Ciotola, M.Ed., CHES, (ret.), CP/TEP is a Certified
Clinical Psychodramatist, health educator,
fitness and yoga
instructor.
The following is a transcript of the original
audio, which is part of the Creative Conversations
on the USABP website (www.USABP.org). Please note that this conversation
was meant
to be a spontaneous ex-change, not
an edited piece. For better or worse, the
transcript retains the unedited quality
of the
conversation.
Serge Prengel: I'm having this conversation
with Linda Ciotola who is a certified clinical
psychodramatist. She is also
a member of USABP,
and she has other certifications in the area
of fitness
and Yoga. One question I can ask you to start
is: in what way is psychodrama related to
what's called action methods?
Linda Ciotola: Psychodrama was actually developed
by Dr. J.L. Moreno back in the early part
of the last century. He was
actually
just a bit
younger than Freud and most action methods
are derived
from psychodrama. So for example, a lot of
Gestalt work, empty chair work, enactments,
a lot of the work that Virginia Satir did, all
derived from
psychodrama. And while they may not have
the whole structure of psychodrama,
they're sort of derived and excerpted, if
you will, from psychodrama. And we refer
to the general field as action methods, but
the specific structure of psychodrama was
created by Dr. Moreno..and
further developed by
Zerka Moreno and others.
S P: And you know, the psychodrama-this action
in many people's mind-is related to something
that involves a lot of people
and is a group process.
So is psychodrama always a group process?
L C: Psychodrama is generally a group process.
Moreno believed that we're all auxiliaries
that help heal
one another and
certainly the newer
research on limbic resonance and empathic
attunement will bear that out. However, I also
do what
are called private psychodramas
where an individual
client may contract with me to do what's
called a private drama
and sometimes it may just be the two of us
and empty chairs and some of what I call
furry auxiliaries, which are puppets and stuffed
animals, sometimes there may be one of my
trainee
students
doing auxiliary work. If it's just two people,
the director and the protagonist, it's called
psychodrama a deux (just for two). So it
can be a very individualized
process in
that regard. But
it's generally used with groups, but it has
a lot of applications for individual practice
as well.
A L: And anot S P: another question that
probably a lot of people who
listen to this would have is: in what way
is this related to body psychotherapy; what's
body-related about
it?
L C: That's a great question. Actually one
of the things that appealed to me about psychodrama,
being
a
body-oriented
person myself,
was
that Moreno knew very early on the importance
of incorporating the body in any
therapeutic work. In fact, one of his great
quotations is, "The body
remembers what the mind forgets." So psychodrama itself, as a method,
is a very embodied practice. So the body is involved. The direction for
psychodrama is, "show me" it's not, "tell me," so the
person has to use the body to put into action their story. So it's
about showing us their story, not just telling us their story.
S P: So I think there are several stages
in a psychodrama . . .
L C: That's right. There's the warm up, the
action, and the sharing; and those are the
three essential
elements. The
warm up is basically
the preparation stage; it's getting the protagonist,
who
is the person whose
story is going to be enacted, and the group,
warmed up, safe, active, ready, accessing
the material. The action stage
is
the actual enactment;
the action
piece, the story that will be shown. And
sharing is a very essential part of psychodrama
and
it takes
place after
the
action has finished; and
it
is when the group comes together and shares
with the protagonist how his or her story
directly related to
or touched
them
in a personal way. In
other words, it's not about advice giving
or commenting on the process, but rather about
saying, "Your story really touched me in particular
because I related to something in particular that happened in my life and
here's what it was . . . " And so the protagonist has shared his or
her story with the group as a way for the group to heal through the
protagonist. In the sharing the group gives back to the protagonist how
they were helped
by the enactment that occurred.
S P: If we go through these 3 stages, one
by one, could you give me some concrete sense
of how you use
the
body related information to deal
with them?
L C: I'd be happy to. I can give you a very
concrete example from a warm-up that I just
did at the
Psychodrama Conference-I did a workshop
there for the attendees and it was a training
workshop, but
still we used warm-up, action, and sharing-and
for the warm-up I asked the participants
to think of a body-based activity that they
really derived pleasure from, that they really
enjoyed, and to say their
name, to say what it was, and
to show us with their body what that was.
So of course we had a number of things; people
showed
us how
they
loved to walk
their
dog or pet the
cat or smell soup that's cooking, feel the
breeze on their face, enjoy swimming, and
to show all
of these body based activities with their
body. And then I had the group mirror each one
back.
And
so involving
the body in that way really warmed people
up to the body based focus of the work
that we were doing, which was a actually
an action based structure called the body dialogue
in
which
the purpose is to help people develop
an empathic
relationship with the body.
S P: So if I understand correctly, then,
in that warm-up phase, you help people connect
with
the
body by going
into the body and
demonstrating
something pleasurable and the other part,
empathy, for the other participants to create empathy
by also reenacting what
they see the protagonist doing.
S P: Exactly L C: Exactly, and of course
in the warm-up, everybody gets to do it, the whole
group
is doing it,
and that's part
of building the safety and developing the
relationships in the group that will allow
the safety to develop so that the work can
take
place. Because a little later on, I know
that is really anchoring
them in
the strength that they
have in their body and the pleasure that
they have in their body. And a bit later on, I
did
some work
with them to
help
them get in touch with
anything about their relationship with the
body that was distressing to them. And I
did that using the body
in a non-verbal
way. I paired
up folks
into dyads and had them communicate in a
non-verbal way what their bodies were needing from
them,
what their bodies
wanted
to say about how they
were feeling and what they needed. So that
was
a way to move them into what we call the
warm-up to prepare them for the
action to take place.
So we anchored the strength in the body first,
and
then we got in touch with what body based
issues were up for people
that they really wanted
to resolve and work on.
S P: So from the beginning, from the warm-up
stage, you didn't create safety by having
people relate to each other's
situations
in terms of describing
them; but the safety came form going into
the body
and connecting at that body level.
L C: Actually I did both: I did the one that
I described to you and I also did something
called "Circle Sociometry" which uses the
body but in a much less specific way. It's where each person in the group
gets to say something that's true for them. We'd like to know if it's true
for other members in the group and so someone might say, for example, "Anyone
who has ever struggled with body image, please step into the circle." And
anyone who has had that struggle and who was willing to step into
the circle then steps in. And so people begin to see that they're not alone.
And that
other people in the group share the same struggles and concerns that
they have. But again they're not just saying it, they're actually stepping
into
the circle with their body.
S P: Ok. So from the very beginning there
is that connection with the body that's part of
the work. So
that is the
first stage, the warm-up,
so what happens at the second stage?
L C: The second stage is the action and that's
the enactment of the story. And that can
be a full psychodrama or it
can be a short piece of
action, which is actually what happened at
the recent
conference, where there was a protagonist
chosen and she wanted to have
a conversation with
her body to try to help and repair the relationship
with the body. So I used role reversal and
included some sensory-motor
processing
into the
work and when it was finished we had some
sharing. Now, it might be, in another situation,
we
may have a full psychodrama,
which means that we
may need more time, of course.
S P: So what kind of time frame are you talking
about for short or long?
L C: Very interesting-I like to have a minimum
of two hours for psychodramatic work, but
I often book four hours for a full psychodrama. And of course
when I
do workshops, particularly if I'm co-leading
workshops with colleagues of mine, then
we
may actually have
a group
coming and we may do what's called a retreat
weekend-I have one actually coming up the
first weekend in June with one or two of
my colleague-and
we may work Friday night, all day Saturday,
and say
half a day Sunday.
So it really varies;
anything from two hours to a whole weekend.
S P: So the whole psychodrama unfolds over
the course of a weekend in that case . .
.
L C: Well a single psychodrama normally would
not be more than two and a half hours. So
we might, in the
course of a workshop,
incorporate
warm-ups, we might use music, movement, art;
other expressive arts modalities
as well as psychodrama.
S P: So back to stage two: the action part.
So how does body information or body action,
body movement, get
to be part
of it?
L C: That's a great question. I'll give you
an example: a protagonist within my work
at one point in time said
that what
she wanted
to get out of the drama was she wanted
to feel less heaviness in her body
when it
came to a relationship that she had with
a particular person in her life. And so
I asked specifically
where in her body
did she feel it and
to describe
it and ask some sensory-motor processing
questions and ask her on a scale of 1 to
10, what was
the
level of heaviness
that she felt and so
at the
end of the psychodrama I was able to ask, "What
is the level of heaviness that you feel
now?" It
of course was an assessment question, but
I also used that information in my directing
to inform
some of my directorial
choices. Another example of how I use body
in my work is I often will use my work
as a Yoga instructor and sometimes I will
ask people to
assume
a certain Yoga position in a role, in a
drama, because taking that
body position will help them to assume
the role in a way that will be beneficial
to them. So for example let's say that
someone is
in a role and they
are
trying to develop the role of being able
to be assertive and speak their truth and
they have difficulty doing it. That would
show up
in the
body
collapsing. So I might actually ask them
to take, let's say, the warrior 2 position,
which is the pose of confidence in Yoga
and I may ask
them
to take that position when they speak their
truth in the drama as
a way of helping them to feel more empowered
as they speak their truth.
S P: So, in other words, there is an interplay
that you pay attention to: what role they're
playing in everyday
life,
what role they'd like to
have. There is a sense of how the role they
play is associated with, say, a collapse
in the body. There is a
sense of
how
the role they would like
to have corresponds to a physical body language
or body position. And you play with that
in the
psychodrama.
L C: Exactly, and I also pay very close attention
to the breath. I do a lot of work with trauma
survivors and, certainly as
we know, breath patterns are very deeply
impacted by
trauma,
and so I will be actually
using my own body to tune in to the protagonist's
body and I will be listening for shallow
breathing or rapid
breathing; just monitoring the client's
breathing, and also asking them to check
in with their own
breathing and to see where that is because
that gives me information as a director about
how are they doing in terms of being able
to stay present and grounded. So I use my work
as a Yoga practitioner
and my knowledge of the body and
the breath to tune in to the protagonist
to help them
stay safe and grounded and to look for signs
of dissociation so
that I
can keep the protagonist
present, safe, and grounded throughout the
drama.
S P: So what you're talking about is that
your work, while one way to describe it is being
a director, certainly
another
way to describe it
is a very strong sense of tuning in to what
the protagonist is doing.
L C: Yes, in fact, that's really part of
the director's role, to be empathically tuned in
to the protagonist
and to be
tracking how the
protagonist is doing throughout the drama.
That's a very important directorial task,
if you
will.
S P: So what helps you do that? Actually,
is your Yoga background helpful?
L C: That's a great question. There are several
things that help me do that, I would say,
especially my background
in
Yoga helps me to do
that; it helps me, myself, to stay present
and grounded, and in the present moment and
able to be in the moment
with the protagonist
so that I can
access my own creativity.
S P: Is that the breathing? I mean what specifically
helps you
. . .
L C: Well, it's breathing, it's keeping,
as I say, all four corners of the feet
grounded on the floor; you know, noticing within myself my breath
and
using my own
awareness, as I said
earlier, of the client. Now there's
also something else that's helpful that
I learned when I
did my training with the Therapeutic Spiral
Modeltm of psychodrama-that's a very specific
adaptation of psychodrama that's used with
trauma survivors. It was developed by Dr.
Kate Hudgins and I'm a certified
team leader
in that model, and
there's something that we learned called
the body doubleTM: there's something called
the double
in regular
classical
psychodrama which is a role in which
the auxiliary, or, sometimes, the director,
but it's usually an auxiliary person, stands
next
to the protagonist
and just
slightly behind, and really
tunes in, verbally and non-verbally, to
what the protagonist is saying and tries, then,
to articulate
what is just
under the surface, but not
being expressed and if the double speaks
what is
accurate, the protagonist repeats it. If
it's not accurate the
protagonist corrects it. So it's a
lovely way for the protagonist to really
get in touch with what is inside and maybe
not just at the surface,
but also
to feel really heard and validated.
Now, a body doubleTM is an adaptation of
that classical double in which the focus
of the doubling is really
at the body
level. So the focus is
on the posture of the protagonist, the
breathing, picking
up on any movements that the body may be
having
that could be very subtle,
and verbalizing
those, bringing those to the attention
of the protagonist, and then leading the protagonist
from what might
be the beginning of, let's say, a dissociative
episode, into the ability to be safe and
grounded
in the body by shifting the position of
the body, the breath, and so forth.
S P: So you would give feedback by telling
the protagonist something about the way their
body is?
L C: Well, actually, the double takes the
role of the inner voice of the protagonist so the
double, or body
doubleTM, would speak from
the "I," as
if he were the protagonist or the protagonist's inner voice. So let's say
I was acting as a body doubleTM for a protagonist and I noticed, let's
say, one foot was off the floor and they were picking at the thumbnail,
I might say, "I can notice that my right foot is off the floor and
resting behind my calf and I can slowly allow that foot to come down to
the floor. And I can notice that my thumb can release from the other finger
and my other hand can gently stroke my thumb rather than picking it." So
it's noticing where the protagonist is and then leading them into
a healthier, safer place.
S P: So you do that and what's your body
position; are you sitting are you standing, are
you .
. . ?
L C: Well whatever the protagonist is doing,
the double is doing.
S P: So as the double you're mirroring, on
a physical level, what the protagonist is
doing, but
in addition
to mirroring it physically, you're also stating
it as an "I" statement so that if the protagonist
is not able to notice it physically, there is also that inner voice
track.
S P: Exactly L C: Exactly, so it is both
verbal and non-verbal. So it's bringing them into
awareness and then
helping
to lead them into
a place of safety in the body. Because, honestly,
if someone is dissociated during a drama,
then
the drama will either
be ineffective at the
very least,
or re-traumatizing. And so safety is always
my primary
concern as a director, and so I'm paying
attention to the pacing of the drama, and
really tuning
in and noticing, "How is my protagonist doing?"
S P: So you mentioned a lot of things about
dissociation and trauma, so maybe, what are
the kinds of people
that you work with
in psychodrama?
L C: Well, as I say, I work with people who
have been traumatized, maybe have suffered
physical, sexual, emotional abuse; have
been through disasters, medical traumas,
wars, any
type of trauma; and often times they
are also suffering with depression and other
mood disorders, anxiety disorders, substance
abuse
disorders,
eating
disorders, so very complex. But I want
to make clear that the action methods in
psychodrama are very useful for role training in
non-trauma
related situations. It's very
useful to use
in school settings, educational programs,
businesses; any
place where people need to have role training
in their lives. And also
there is group work,
that is called sociodrama that is focused
on issues that are particular to a group, that
people have
in common and want to explore.
So it has a
lot of applications, this just happens to
be my particular area of interest and expertise.
S P: And if I understand correctly, it's
not something that you do exclusively with
one client-
something that you can do on a one time basis in collaboration
with somebody's therapist,
or.
.
.
L C: Yes. For example, I work very closely
with a colleague of mine who is a licensed
clinical social worker and
she sees her clients, of course,
on a very regular basis and often times brings
me in as an adjunctive therapist specifically
to do action methods with
her client or clients on a particular
issue. And I might do that with the therapist
and the
client and myself in, let's say, a two hour
time
block in her office,
or we might schedule
time for a private psychodrama so we would
go for a longer period of time and I may
bring in one
or two
auxiliaries.
So that's one of the more frequent
ways in which I work.
S P: And I wanted to just maybe still stay
there for a moment about how you measure-is
there any
kind of
benchmark-or how
do you evaluate progress
or goals?
L C: That's a great question. I said earlier
that we always ask in the very beginning
what does the client
want to have
to be different
as a result of the drama? And so, for example
let's say the client mentioned letting go
of the feeling of heaviness,
and I might say, "On a scale
of 1 to 10, where is that heaviness now?" Well if the person says
that the heaviness is 9 at the beginning of the drama, and I ask at the
end of the drama, "What level is the heaviness now" and they
say, "two," then that's a measure that we met the contract for
the drama, that there was a significant decrease in the feeling of heaviness.
It's not always that specific, it might be that the protagonist could say, "I
want to really work on my ability to speak the truth for myself without
collapsing, without feeling guilty, or whatever the issue is, we state
the contract for the work at the beginning and then we evaluate at the
end, "Was the contract for the work met?" And that's a question
that the protagonist can answer.
S P: And so that gives us a transition, and
we spent quite some time, for the second
phase, but that maybe
gives us
a transition for the third
phase of the drama . . .
L C: Exactly, and the third phase, as I said
earlier, is about sharing; it's when the
group shares with
the protagonist how his
or her work
touched them, helped them relate it to experiences
that they
had in their own life.
And so it's also a way of what we call "de-roleing," so if any
group members played a role in the drama, they can speak from what
they experienced in-role in the drama, and then speak from their own personal
lives. And that helps the process of de-roleing as well as helps
the protagonist
to really hear how his or her work was useful for other members of
the group. And, of course, it also helps to enhance group solidarity and
the
group cohesiveness if, let's say, we have an ongoing psychodrama
group in particular and it may meet weekly or once a month or twice a month,
and as the group continues to meet, the cohesiveness from the sharing
continues
to build and so the work of the drama can go deeper and deeper over
time because the safety that's felt. But there can be safety felt in a
single
session. I've seen it done, and know that a lot of the work that
we do in warm-up and then that we finish in the sharing really provides
that
container of safety.
S P: So thanks, Linda, that was really a
very nice, very great introduction to psychodrama
and how it interacts with body psychotherapy
. . .
L C : Well, my pleasure, I really love using
these two fields together and I also love
working with other colleagues and
interweaving music and
art and having what I consider a lovely tapestry
of healing.
This is part of USABP's monthly Creative
Conversations, hosted by Serge Prengel.
Transcribed by Calin Cheznoiu
This material is protected by copyright.
It may be freely copied, provided its use is solely
for educational pur-poses,
not for
financial gain or in a commercial setting.
It should be properly cited when used
in any subse-quent written work or other
media.
Use
or redistribution of this material for monetary
compensation or
individual
or organizational financial gain is strictly
prohibited. CUSABP 2007. All rights
reserved.
www.USABP.org
Back to Top